WIP - PAGE/PROJECT IN THE WORKS - WIP
I've come across more than a couple of occassions recently in which I found myself wanting to controllably spin stuff while tinkering on projects. The best tool at my disposal for this task was my "little" 6 inch rotary table for my mill.
While it's certainly up to the task, it's a heavy little bastard! So to keep me from lugging it up and down the stairs from the shop to the 'lab', I decided I should take a stab at a DIY, lighter-duty variant.
OnShape CAD files available to do with as you please here.
The above image shows the major externally-visible components. The Base is a printed part that provides not only the structural support for loads from all of the other components, but also is responsible for controlling the alignments of the motion components.
On top of the Table is the kinematic mount, formed by bar magnets set at 45 degrees from the table surface (so a 90 deg V.) If you haven't come across this style of interface before, you can find general info if you give a Google to "Maxwell clamp" or "kinematic coupler." I included a very similar coupler on my passive rotary / overkill papertowel holder build , as well as a great many of projects in my day job over the years...they're just tops :) hopefully seeing the repeatability numbers down below will start bringing you around to sharing my fondness for 'em.
One thing I decided to add that my machining rotary is missing is a power feed! In addition to the hand wheel for manually driving the table, a DC motor can be coupled to the other side of the drive mechanism. There also should be plenty of space to swap out this DC motor for a stepper, should I decide to down the line.
The Table is driven by a worm gear drive housed inside the base, as shown in the below image. The worm gear is integrated into Hub component, which attaches to the Table via three M5 fasteners. Sandwiched between the Hub and Base is a needle thrust bearing. This thrust bearing's counterpart is the main bearing that is integrated into the surfaces of the Base and Table. V-groove channels in the top of the Base and the bottom of the Table form the bearing races, and the rolling elements are 9.5mm steel balls (aka 3/8 inch slingshot ammo....hey, it's quite round and damn cheap).
On the hand crank side of the table, a printed coupler sits inside the "hand wheel horn", held in place with a roller skate bearing (I used these. They're overkill for this, but they run really smooth.) The hand wheel presses onto the coupler with a light interference fit. It's really just intended as a close running fit, but with 3d printed parts it ends up being more like a bit of an interference fit.
On the power feed side is a similar printed coupler, but with a d-hub hole for engaging the motor shaft and no support bearing (the motor has a bushing that's serving the same purpose.) For a motor, I'm using one of these 24VDC, 150RPM motors. Something a little faster might be nice, but I might worry about the wear on the worm. Plus I don't really need this thing to be speed demon, so I don't have any plans to swap it.
Just for the sake of making sure there's no uncertainty with what I mean by runout, allow me to elaborate...probably to much. Feel free to skim. When I say, "runout", what I I'm referring to is any movement of the Table, relative to the Base, other than the desired spinny bit. There are three types of runout that I want to measure on my rotary table:
Axial runout is error motion that is along the axis of rotation, or 'up and down' as I'd probably refer to it if just pointing at it and talking ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. But hey, in good news, my gif-making skills definitely improved a bit for this one. So by Axial I bet it's gonna be fuckin epic.
Measurement Setups
In order to obtain the measurements I'm after, it will require nine sets of measurements. Each set of measurements will include measurements recorded at consistent intervals throughout the 360 degree travel of the table. So why nine? What seem like an extra six will (hopefully) make a bit more sense shortly, but they're going to help us make sure we're measuring our actual motion and not the surface/shape of the surface we're measuring.
The nine measurements will require the indicator/sensor being mounted in three positions. Or, if you're flush with cash, just get yourself three sensors and a nice frame for em...while you're at it, send me a set too :)
Position 1 - Low on the post, near to the mount face
Position 2 - 50mm up the shaft from Position 1
Position 3 - On top and centered on end of rod.
The remaining six measurements, are repeats of these positions at each position of the kinematic mount. I'm using the kinematic mount here to perform a variation on the "reversal technique" to cancel out part geometry. If you aren't familiar, but are interested, or just want to see if I'm totally bullshitting you, you can find plenty of info out there by giving something like, "reversal technique metrology". The kinematic mount allows us to repeatably position the test sample at 120 degree offsets. I'll show below in the data analysis how I then used these offset datasets.
WIP - PAGE/PROJECT IN THE WORKS - WIP
I had some extra linear rods and bearings around, and found the straightness of my heat setting skills lacking. So I tossed this guy together and have putting it to pretty steady use for the last few months. Figured if it’s proving handy for me, might as well share it.
I originally designed the clamp for use with my Hakko FX888, and more recently have been using it with my old Weller WES51. If your handle is too small, you could wrap it in some high-temp silicone.
The linear rails are held in the split clamps shown below (and for this reason, I'd recommend printing them in PETG.)
Putting in these heat sets in the Base is a little tricky since the iron needs to go through the clearance hole for the fastener. But as long as you're careful, you shouldn't end up with a messy tip...nobody likes a messy tip.
On the Carriage side, all of the inserts should be pretty straightforward. I just set it up in the Panavise and went ta town.
A sturdy benchtop/desktop organizer, originally intended for ‘standard’ zip tie sizes. But I’ve since printed scaled versions of this for a handful of different desktop organizer needs :) It’s far from fancy, but it gets the job done!
The base is a large flat area, so prepare accordingly for either sticky (PETG, et al) or bendy (ABS, et al) stuff!
Otherwise, it’s a consistent cross-section, straight up. So should be pretty straightforward and safe in any material of your choice. A personal favorite of mine is one I printed with iron-filled PLA. Having the extra weight to it is great for the shop!
I’ve been pleasantly surprised with this little setup! I think this was the first toolbox organizer build I did with TPU, and that combined with just kind of a swag at the tolerancing on the bit holders to get a snug, but not too snug fit had me 50/50 on whether this would be scrap :) But a few years later and this pic was taken in my toolbox just yesterday, still goin strong and, shockingly, pretty well populated.
The holder is the Orange Overture TPU and I printed the bit holders from their Light Gray PETG. I really like using TPU for anything that sort of ‘interfaces’ the tool to the drawer. It helps keep everything from sliding around (this particular toolbox doesn’t have drawer liners, and apparently I like to do things the more complicated way :) ) and also gives some impact resistance for dropping tools into the box, etc.
I made holders for the various bits that I have/see, but it’s far from comprehensive. If there are some you’ve got rolling around your drawer that aren’t covered here, I’d be curious to hear what ya got!
Designed to hold nine(9) — 1/4" drive sockets. I made these specifically to be able to quickly grab these little socket sets and toss them in a travel toolbox, or just around for a project. The little leaf flexures have held up quite well for me printed with this Overture PETG…and it’s so sparkly :) I would stick to something not too stiff, like PETG or ASA. I haven’t tried, but I would suspect PLA might fail on the flexures.
Find it on Printables
A little socket holder that I mainly use for grouping random/loose sockets in my toolbox and for grabbing small sets of sockets to carry around (hence the ‘pocket socket’ name) when working on something specific. It keeps me from having to carry multiple loose sockets or lug around a full set.
I would NOT recommend printing these in PLA or any other stiff material. I have printed all of mine from PETG and they have held up great. Something like ASA would probably be an even more appropriate choice, especially if you like to see how far away from the box you can land your tools in the drawer :)
Shouldn’t require any supports, brims, or the like. I’ve mainly printed mine with coarse layers (0.3–0.55) on 0.6 and 0.8 nozzles, but it should print fine on pretty much anything under that. Going above that I would just worry about how much the printing path dominates the geometry of the flexures (might make them too thick and cause them to break and/or be difficult to get sockets on).
Find it on Printables
A little socket holder that I mainly use for grouping random/loose sockets in my toolbox and for grabbing small sets of sockets to carry around (hence the ‘pocket socket’ name) when working on something specific. It keeps me from having to carry multiple loose sockets or lug around a full set.
I would NOT recommend printing these in PLA or any other stiff material. I have printed all of mine from PETG and they have held up great. Something like ASA would probably be an even more appropriate choice, especially if you like to see how far away from the box you can land your tools in the drawer :)
Shouldn’t require any supports, brims, or the like. I’ve mainly printed mine with coarse layers (0.3–0.55) on 0.6 and 0.8 nozzles, but it should print fine on pretty much anything under that. Going above that I would just worry about how much the printing path dominates the geometry of the flexures (might make them too thick and cause them to break and/or be difficult to get sockets on).
Nothin too fancy, just a wrench holder for my box wrenches. I more or less was aiming to recreate the long-lost holder that originally came with the wrench set. As with most of my toolbox organizer parts, I built this one from orange Overture TPU.
Intended to keep my breaker bars from rolling around and also just to help add some organization for my toolbox. As with all of the other orange stuff shown on this page, I printed these from Overture TPU. The diamond pattern on the top and bottom surfaces was intended to 1) keep the TPU from destroying my build plate, and 2) I was originally going to use this diamond pattern to make things stackable/modular, but haven’t gotten around to building it out any further.
Holds up to 23 R8 Collets. With the feet installed, it holds the collets up at a 30 degree incline. I intended for the feet to be glued in, but in my print (granted, it’s ugly…don’t judge me, I used up some old PETG filament knowing it’s just gonna get beat to hell anyway :) )
Find it on Printables
Like the bucket of assorted fasteners on that bottom shelf, this category is for stuff that I didn't know how to group...oh, and speaking of those fasteners, check out the little sortin fella!
2020 Aluminum Extrusion Hardware |
Quick Bolt Sorter |
During the good financial decision-making times of Covid lockdowns, etc. I decided it was a good idea to buy a license for the Fusion360 Generative Design extension...Good news, I did finally pay that off :) I had worked around, and been somewhat involved in a handful of Topology Optimization/Generative Design projects through my work, and I've found the tech super interesting for some time. So after the free trial, and feeling like I was just starting to gain some level of competence in Fusion360's tool....I done did it, and bought the year. Ok, now that I'm done justifying that to myself...I mean you...
<engineering/design> What I really like about Generative Design is that it forces the designer to think about the thing they are trying to design from it's core requirements: Forces, Interfaces, and Keep Outs. I think it's far from perfect, especially given the still very primitive Design For Manufacture capabilities these tools have (among other shortcomings, but this one is certainly a big one to me.)
<precision engineering> One last also (for now), but ALSO, what I find exciting about these tools from a precision engineering perspective, is that the above-mentioned focus on forces and interfaces, these tools are extremely well-suited to kinematic/exact constraint designs! I think every one of the Generative Design projects below features at least some aspects of kinematic constraint (I say, "I think" because I may or may not be writing this before I go through my files and remind myself what all I actually made vs what I just thought about making ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )
A lot of projects I work on/have worked on seem to involve the controlled movement of fluids. Below is a bit of a history of my builds involving attempts at obtaining this controlled movement for incompressible fluids. I haven’t done much myself with making custom solutions for the compressible stuff, but if you’re interested in such things, I thoroughly enjoy Major Hardware’s “Fan Showdown” series :)
This article/section is by no means intended as a thorough overview on the design and operation of pumps. While I will try to give some overview on operating principles and design considerations as I go, this is mainly just going to be a wander through my personal builds and experiences.
I’m sure there are innumerable sources online for (much better) detailed discussions of the workings of peristaltic pumps. So I’m just going to hit the highlights, and I’ll try to remember to find some promising links and add them below, should a deep dive seem intriguing to ya.
The fluid being pumped is carried into the pump in a compliant tubing. This tube is routed around some portion of a circular/cylindrical path around the axis of the pump and then exits the pump. This is one interesting/attractive aspect of peristaltic pumps, the fluid never has to leave the tube that it is in, making these pumps well-suited to situations where contamination and/or leaks are highly undesirable. The housing that features the cylindrical wall that the tubing is being routed along can be considered the Stator, and that is generally the nomenclature that I tend to use.
So if there’s a Stator, there must be a Rotor…? Yup, the rotor includes some set of features that extend out to some defined gap between this feature and the Stator wall. These features, which in many peristaltic pumps are rolling element bearings, pinch the tubing to the point of sealing (ideally) the tube. As the rotor turns, this contact point proceeds around the circumference. Because the pinched point of the tube is sealed, the volume of fluid in the tube ‘ahead’ of the pinch point are, as a result, pushed forward. So, keep rotating, keep pushing….pretty much as simple as that!
Pros:
Cons:
A couple of years back, I had a concept for an in-line-mixing hydroponics system. The idea being that the supplies to the system would be just pure water and nutrient concentrates, and a series of pumps and valves would allow precise dosing mixes to each target plant in a system (I refer to this concept as Rail Yard Hydro, since it moves the fluids around the tubing network quite like rail cars are moved around a rail system. I’m planning to add a separate page diving into that one a bit deeper since it is the design scheme I am using in my current projects.)
Well, to facilitate this plan, I wanted to find an option for a dosing pump that I could integrate in to my control system (aka Arduinos and Raspberry Pi’s :)). Unfortunately, I quickly found that a servo-driven peristaltic pump could easily set me back north of $100….so I set out to spend many multiples of that making my own!
Actually, when I saw the pricing, I decided I should see if I could make myself a cheapo, manual version that I could use to just test out some basic questions on the Rail Hydro idea (mainly verifying that I could induce good material mixing in-line and that there was no cross-contamination between fluid reservoirs.) And so, ‘twas this endeavor that resulted in the pump I’m apparently referring to as “Test Build 1”
She ain't pretty (especially after a good while of getting knocked around), but the pic above shows the dual pump setup I rigged up for my testing needs. I was VERY pleasantly surprised that, other than a tweak to the hand wheel, these things worked pretty damn well!
I decided upfront that I was going to go with a resin printed build, because I thought the high stiffness and good surface finish throughout the 'pinch region' would give me a better chance. Since I was already going to have the good surface roughness, I might as well also integrate the main bearing into the printed parts.
In the image of the model, below, the Stator is the part shown in green, and the Rotor is shown in blue(ish.) Riding on the rotor are roller skate bearings to provide the contact with the tube. Race 1 has v-grooves on both sides of the race, providing the main constraint for locating the rotor, and Race 2 has a v-groove on the Stator, but only a single plane of contact on the Rotor side. This keeps from over-constraining the bearing.
The absurdly overkill bolt running through the center is a real showcase of "using what I had on hand" :) in that these were the only bolt/nut sets I had on hand with the length I was looking for.